WHO's Power Grab: Global Health Amendments Threaten Bodily Autonomy Amidst War Distraction
Stop it Before it's too Late!
October 18, 2019, four years ago, Event 201 was held at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in New York City in partnership with the World Economic Forum & the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Have we since learned they tell you what they’re going to do before they do it? Nearly the entire world, 194 member states, are participants in the World Health Organization (WHO). The 194 member states are facing the absolute takeover of all autonomy when it comes to health & freedom decisions by the unelected, mostly privately-funded WHO.
The WHO cares not for “…full respect for the dignity of human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons” as they actually cross that line out of the existing International Health Regulations of 2005 in one of the 300 proposed amendments to the document.
In January, I wrote a Substack article addressing the Pandemic Treaty & some of the amendments to the International Health Regulations. Both the Pandemic Treaty & the amendments to the International Health Regulations are on the WHO table for voting & subsequently passing by the 194 member states. Ten months have quietly passed (on this subject) & many distractions have been placed on the global economic & social plates of the population. I’d like to bring these amendments & treaty back into the light before it’s too late to act. We should all be concerned by the World Health Organization’s pressure to extend its powers both structurally & financially with a permanent effect over the sovereignty of the countries & over the self-determination of the people.
The reform process started in 2021, along two congruent regulating streams. The first will be significant amendments to the already existing International Health Regulations & secondly an entirely new Pandemic Treaty are both on the table for discussion/debate with a deadline for each member nation to either accept or reject the proposed amendments/treaty by May of 2024. The voting process takes place behind closed doors & it is not openly discussed in the news or political arena because they want you distracted by war & other social challenges. They want to quietly slip the stripping of your civil liberties & right to decide what is best for your own health under the rug while no one is paying attention.
What are the International Health Regulations?
The original International Sanitary Regulations were adopted in 1951 under the WHO Constitution to set out agreed approaches and obligations for countries to prepare for, and respond to, disease outbreaks and other acute public health events with risk of international spread. The original International Sanitary Regulations were revised three times – in 1969 (when they became International Health Regulations), in 1981, and in 2005. The IHR are an instrument of international law that is legally-binding on 196 State Parties, including the 194 WHO Member States. The IHR, in their version adopted in 2005, have been amended twice – in 2014 and 2022 (the most-recent amendments will come into force in May 2024). The newest proposed amendments come in response to the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. WHO
During the week of October 1-7, 2023, the Working Group to the Amendments (WGIHR) met to discuss the 307 proposed amendments to the 2005 IHR focusing on the primary areas of:
Points Of Entry
Public Health Measures
Health Documents
General Provisions
Final Provisions
Definitions, Purpose and Scope, Principles and Responsible Authorities
The Emergency Committee
Decision Instrument for The Assessment and Notification of Events.
In a nutshell, the WHO claims the two legally-binding instruments are absolute & make the WHO unquestionable when it comes to health matters in pandemic prevention preparedness & response. The WHO claims to have the ultimate expertise & power in all aspects of a wide field of subjects. If the member states do not proactively reject or submit their own amendments to the 307 proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, they will be considered in acceptance or a default ‘Yes’ vote to the proposed amendments.
The current existing draft of the Amendments of the International Health Regulations - Article 13A & Article 42 states the WHO shall be granted the power of massive self-authorization whenever it claims to act under this purpose. Article 12 establishes the preconditions for a Public Health Emergency of International Concern together with Annex two of the proposed amendments on the basis of an extremely vague concept. One Health which basically means anything & Health ecosystem concerns about the level of CO2 which if it rises ‘high enough’ which can give rise to a public health emergency to a pandemic.
The WHO Shall Develop & Publish a List of Required Health Products!
If you Create a Cure, the WHO can Seize it for the Betterment of all!
What will be Considered a Public Health Emergency?
There is no mechanism built into either the amendments nor the treaty that the people or member states for challenging the WHO’s assessments of the situation regarding a public health emergency or imposing an experimental medical treatment. The WHO can authorize itself to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) & maintain it for as long as it deems fit.
A potential or actual public health emergency of international concern…
For example, if you examine the current declared States of Emergency in the United States determined by the Department of Health & Human Services, we can observe the following:
Note the emergency may be extended by the Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services. The secretary would likely be the person extending the emergency or ‘perceived’ emergency subject to the whims of the WHO.
Congress must be notified of the declaration within 48 hours, and relevant agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, and Federal Bureau of Investigation, must be kept informed.
All the aforementioned organizations will fall under the national guidelines & be subject to the WHO.
The WHO will have not only the authority to declare recommendations made by several experts but to impose those recommendations on the people of either the entire world or to certain regions with lockdowns & restricted access.
It also gives the WHO power to impose experimental treatments which can be found in the International Health Regulations Article 18. Article 18 also requires a precondition proof of vaccination which was initially non-binding which then becomes binding in the amendment. In Article 13A & 42 commits the member states to the amendments.
In addition, the WHO will reserve & assume authority to control all information that claims to be related to health, the right to censor information, & the right to interfere with social communication in Article 44.
The WHO will make legally binding decisions & instill a system of surveillance to have a monopoly of information including the right of censorship. There will be no possibility to have an open debate or different opinions or different hypothesis or different science that differs from the WHO.
The distinction between the two legal instruments of the International Health Regulations & the Pandemic Treaty. The Pandemic Treaty will be considered by the WHO itself as a treaty and will be subject to the international process of debate & ratification. According to the WHO Constitution Article 21, the amendments to the International Health Regulations will be automatically come into force within 12 months of the vote in May 2024. After May 2025, the International Health Regulations will become law. Although it seems like May 2025 is far away, the vote is only seven months from now & it remains under the radar.
The public will not brought into the discussion at all once the vote has taken place. If you didn’t think informed consent existed before, it certainly won’t once these amendments & treaty are passed. We expressly have to keep in mind they crossed out “with full respect for the dignity of human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons.”
At this time is appears the governments of the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Australia, The United States, Canada, & New Zealand have not submitted any rejections to either the amendments or the treaty.
Why does it Matter?
Four years ago, the same people who prepared, planned, & executed Event 201 are the same people who are supporting the amendments to the International Health Regulations & The Pandemic Treaty. The effects of mandating an experimental ‘health’ product have provided nothing short of disastrous effects on the global population:
The global population was duped, experimented on, exploited, & mandated to take a deadly product. Millions have perished & suffered as a result. The amendments to the International Health Regulations & The Pandemic Treaty seek to impose global control over every aspect of your life; your freedom of movement, your freedom of employment, & your freedom of bodily autonomy.
What can my Fellow Warriors do to Stop the WHO Takeover?
It is a matter & a duty for all citizens to impose pressures toward representatives & political powers to ensure they understand what is going on with the WHO concerning the Amendments to the International Health Regulations & the Pandemic Treaty.
Sign the Petition to Stop the WHO: Petition
Contact Your Senator: Senators List
Tweet this to your senators:
Dear Senator,
I want the United States to #ExitTheWHO.
I want you to submit companion legislation in the Senate in support of House Resolution 79, the
World Health Organization Withdrawal Act.
And attach this picture:
Don’t let them distract you with war & White House speaker battles while these amendments & treaty slip by unchallenged!
Until next time my fellow Warriors, stay informed, stay vigilant, Ever Forward!
